http://www.forthgo.com/blog/2009/11/17/chapel-hill-election-clustering-revised/ Code and Recreations of Xan Gregg Sat, 17 Jul 2010 15:38:11 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.forthgo.com/blog/2009/11/17/chapel-hill-election-clustering-revised/comment-page-1/#comment-6473 George Entenman Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:36:13 +0000 http://www.forthgo.com/blog/?p=360#comment-6473 FYI, I cast only two votes for town council. FYI, I cast only two votes for town council.

]]> http://www.forthgo.com/blog/2009/11/17/chapel-hill-election-clustering-revised/comment-page-1/#comment-6457 xan Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:40:51 +0000 http://www.forthgo.com/blog/?p=360#comment-6457 I just tried it with 3.22 votes per person, which was the average for fully participating precincts. The precinct clustering was unaffected, but the candidate clustering was. The council multiplication factor affected which council candidates aligned more closely with the mayor candidates, which I should have expected and discounted those clusterings. I just tried it with 3.22 votes per person, which was the average for fully participating precincts. The precinct clustering was unaffected, but the candidate clustering was. The council multiplication factor affected which council candidates aligned more closely with the mayor candidates, which I should have expected and discounted those clusterings.

]]> http://www.forthgo.com/blog/2009/11/17/chapel-hill-election-clustering-revised/comment-page-1/#comment-6456 CitizenWill Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:43:58 +0000 http://www.forthgo.com/blog/?p=360#comment-6456 The analysis is very cool Xan. How hard would it be to do one where each voter was presumed to cast 3 votes? My sense was that was a very typical case this year for many voters. The analysis is very cool Xan. How hard would it be to do one where each voter was presumed to cast 3 votes? My sense was that was a very typical case this year for many voters.

]]>