Comments on: Java vs. C++ vs. C# at Finding Primes http://www.forthgo.com/blog Code and Recreations of Xan Gregg Wed, 28 Sep 2011 02:29:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: xan http://www.forthgo.com/blog/java-vs-c-vs-c-at-finding-primes/comment-page-1/#comment-7269 xan Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:58:05 +0000 http://www.forthgo.com/blog/java-vs-c-vs-c-at-finding-primes/#comment-7269 There is a link to the source code in the document. You'll see the linked list implementation is not STL and, besides, that was the one case that C++ did consistently better. There is a link to the source code in the document. You’ll see the linked list implementation is not STL and, besides, that was the one case that C++ did consistently better.

]]> By: Bob http://www.forthgo.com/blog/java-vs-c-vs-c-at-finding-primes/comment-page-1/#comment-7265 Bob Wed, 02 Mar 2011 11:17:14 +0000 http://www.forthgo.com/blog/java-vs-c-vs-c-at-finding-primes/#comment-7265 Dude you are faking.. aint no way the benchmarks you got are true.. What linked list implementation did you use? In C++ there are at least 1000, please show us the implemetation. STL may be slow .. so pure code comparison should be much better. Not fair to compare built in type/features of C#/java with some bad implementation in C++. for the sole reason that built in types in Java/C# probably were written in C++... So, bottom line, please show us exactly what code did you use... Dude you are faking.. aint no way the benchmarks you got are true..

What linked list implementation did you use?
In C++ there are at least 1000, please show us the implemetation. STL may be slow .. so pure code comparison should be much better.

Not fair to compare built in type/features of C#/java with some bad implementation in C++. for the sole reason that built in types in Java/C# probably were written in C++…
So, bottom line, please show us exactly what code did you use…

]]> By: xan http://www.forthgo.com/blog/java-vs-c-vs-c-at-finding-primes/comment-page-1/#comment-6654 xan Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:08:38 +0000 http://www.forthgo.com/blog/java-vs-c-vs-c-at-finding-primes/#comment-6654 George, I didn't record the .Net or MSVC versions, but I was using the current versions as of the time of writing (mid 2005). George, I didn’t record the .Net or MSVC versions, but I was using the current versions as of the time of writing (mid 2005).

]]> By: george http://www.forthgo.com/blog/java-vs-c-vs-c-at-finding-primes/comment-page-1/#comment-6653 george Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:49:30 +0000 http://www.forthgo.com/blog/java-vs-c-vs-c-at-finding-primes/#comment-6653 Thanks for taking the time to design and share it with us! What version of .net and MS C++ did you use? When looking for benchmarks, I prefer to focus on the user experience rather than a micro-benchmark, like http://www.codeproject.com/KB/dotnet/RuntimePerformance.aspx Thanks for taking the time to design and share it with us!
What version of .net and MS C++ did you use?
When looking for benchmarks, I prefer to focus on the user experience rather than a micro-benchmark, like http://www.codeproject.com/KB/dotnet/RuntimePerformance.aspx

]]> By: FORTH GO » Blog Archive » Find Primes Updated http://www.forthgo.com/blog/java-vs-c-vs-c-at-finding-primes/comment-page-1/#comment-25 FORTH GO » Blog Archive » Find Primes Updated Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:34:49 +0000 http://www.forthgo.com/blog/java-vs-c-vs-c-at-finding-primes/#comment-25 [...] FindPrimes Benchmark Find Primes Updated I’ve updated the FindPrimes Benchmark page with results running under Windows. I also updated the C+ [...] [...] FindPrimes Benchmark Find Primes Updated I’ve updated the FindPrimes Benchmark page with results running under Windows. I also updated the C+ [...]

]]>